<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: E-Mail and the Virtual Team</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.writeitwell.com/blog/e-mail-and-the-virtual-team/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.writeitwell.com/blog/e-mail-and-the-virtual-team/</link>
	<description>Business writing that gets results</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 22:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Sampson</title>
		<link>http://www.writeitwell.com/blog/e-mail-and-the-virtual-team/#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Sampson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.writeitwell.com/?p=75#comment-200</guid>
		<description>What is the reason that email "has to work better"? Are your clients trying to use for things that other collaborative tools are better suited for? Eg, have they looked at Groove, or Central Desktop, or ... any of the others?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the reason that email &#8220;has to work better&#8221;? Are your clients trying to use for things that other collaborative tools are better suited for? Eg, have they looked at Groove, or Central Desktop, or &#8230; any of the others?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
